Sitemap   l   Privacy Policy   l   Contact Us
 
           
 

SQI™ System

Introduction to SQI™ System

 
   

Success Quotient Intelligence
SQI™ System

Introduction to SQI™ System

In this latest researched discovery based on intensive practical derivative understanding and many past academic research developments conducted by other scientists, psychologist and behaviorists, we had put together a more comprehensive, realistic and yet succinct system to bring about the awareness and application of the Human Potentials, Human Capability and Human Achievement possibilities. We now arrive with a clearer, a more consistent and simpler practical application process on identifying individual potential awareness, discovery and specific application for Success; focusing on the person, as a highly performing and effective professional and as valuable corporate leaders. Success Quotient Intelligence SQI™ thus is paramount for both the person as well as organization in the pursuit of excellence through the growing and development the Human potentials and realizing the optimum capability through desirable competencies discovery and application for all areas of success.

The purpose here is to give a quick overview of SQI™ We shall comment on the following areas:

 

1.

Personality

2.

Matching Personalities and Jobs

3.

Challenges Concerning Personality Testing Tools for Work Performance Application

4.

Why Use Success Quotient Intelligence System?

5.

The Research Underlying the Success Quotient Intelligence System

6.

How Success Quotient Intelligence System Work?

 

Personality

Some people in the workplace are loud, talkative and do not like looking at details, others are quiet, passive and like to be detailed. These terms used to describe people (in the workplace) are what most psychologists called as personality traits (behaviors).

An individual’s personality (in the workplace) is the unique combination of the psychological traits we use to describe that person.

Over the years, researchers have attempted to focus specifically on which traits would lead to identifying one’s personality. Three of these most widely recognized efforts include the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), DISC and the five-factor model (big-five model).

 

Matching Personalities and Jobs

In the corporate world, there is an important need to predict job success accurately when putting people with certain personalities into certain types of jobs. Hence, corporate users will like to have personality test reports to show workplace specific traits that fit well into certain types of job.

Personality tests that are descriptive and not designed to predict job success will not serve the purpose.

One of the more widely known personality-job fit research works was from psychologist John Holland. His research states that an employee’s satisfaction with his or her job, as well as his or her likelihood of leaving that job, depends on the degree to which the individual’s personality matches the occupational environment. Organizations are likely to have higher-performing and more-satisfied, motivated and committed employees if consideration is given to matching personality types with jobs.

However, unlike technical skills, work behaviors are not straight forward to quantify, test and verify. Hence, without some form of measurement instrument, behavioral competencies cannot be objectively assessed and is not possible to match a person based on an understanding of his / her type of workplace personality to a certain type of job with a high degree of accuracy. To address this concern, further research has been conducted including the research work of Dan Harrison which focuses on work performance factors.

 

Challenges Concerning Personality Testing Tools for Work Performance Application

With the growing number of personality testing tools in the marketplace, a number of challenges concerning its effectiveness arise and these are also questions to be answered when one is evaluating and selecting a suitable tool to use.

 

1.

Does the report tell me how the person sees himself/herself or how others see them?

2.

Can you base on the test results to accurately predict the specific behaviors of an individual in a variety of situations with different people in the workplace?

3.

Will short-term mood swing affect the accuracy of the test results?

4.

Are the results affected by having different cultural backgrounds?

5.

Does it label people on the basis of the scores and is it overly-reliant on self-report instruments to produce the test results?

6.

Even with high accuracy in its diagnosis, can the tool prescribe solutions in areas of personality imbalance?

 

Why Use Success Quotient Intelligence System?

The Success Quotient Intelligence (SQI) System is a diagnostic and prescriptive tool to draw out the best in an individual such that the individual can experience his/her best to achieve top-level performance.

Care is taken to ensure the profile report does not label the individual being profiled or provide overly diplomatic descriptions about the person. This approach is aligned with the very fundamental goal of using the system, or as a matter of fact, the goal in using any personality testing tools. The goal is about developing a person’s behavioural competence, not tearing people down or putting more negative energy in a person by using labelling words to judge them on the one end or using positive words to the point of keeping them unaware of areas to develop on the other end.

The system focuses on producing test results that will accurately predict the specific behaviors of an individual in a variety of situations with different people in the workplace based on an in-depth understanding of the personal values / belief system of the person.

To solve a problem, it is known that we need to know and treat the roots and not symptoms. Behavior in the workplace is an outward manifestation of our beliefs and emotions. Hence, focusing solely on understanding and measuring the behaviors in the workplace alone without knowing and understanding the person’s values and emotions system can be misleading.

The research started with the notion that every person is a self-motivated individual. It is a matter of what motivates the person (whether negatively or positively motivated) and draws the energy out from the person which aligns with the person’s belief system. Therefore, whatever a person perceives as aligned with his / her own belief system; the person will be motivated to initiate a positive respond. This is especially so since the system is looking at people in the workplace and every person have his / her own past experiences that shaped his / her belief system and along side, his / her expectation of self and people around them.

SQI is not just a testing tool, it is a system based on validated research that integrates the existing research to better understand how people are motivated to behave the way they are in different situations with different people and hence how to develop them without having to painfully overcome their resistance to the suggested changes (including deployment) for development. A system that will help you gain deep understanding on how the person will behave, why the person behave in certain ways and how to get their ‘buy-in’ to be developed with the willingness to exert high levels of effort to reach compatible individual and organizational goals. It is a system that helps you to hire people most suitable for a particular job, develop them effectively and thereby retaining them who have the values and performance you will treasure.

The system therefore focuses on critical emotional and behavioral competencies including positive emotions management to stay above negative situations (especially in implementation and operations maintaining activities), positive interpersonal communications, creative presentations, joint problem-solving conflicts and negotiations management , sound decision-making, resource organizational skills and innovations management.

SQI System tells you how the person tends to behave.  This includes behavior that the person himself/herself may not be conscious of, but that may be observed by others.  It also includes behavior that the person is conscious of, but that others have not observed (for example, a person who manages to curb his/her natural temperament for the duration of an interview).   A SQI report is able to describe actual behavior rather than the perceptions of self or others, because the instrument is based on two theories: these are Choice-Performance model (itself derived from Motivated-Behavioral Research) and Optimal Balance Research.  Please refer to our website section on theory for more information.

The accuracy of the SQI System Report is not affected by short-term mood swings.  However, a few traits can be affected by a person’s current life circumstances, normally over a period of several months.  Prolonged and particularly difficult passages in life can lower some scores but changes will rarely be dramatic.  SQI’s “test-retest coefficient” is very high (.87) in comparison to that of other assessments.  When a person completes the questionnaire once and then again five months later, the scores on average will be 85% the same. 

SQI’s ability to reveal deeply rooted understanding into workplace behavior is largely based on the structure of the questionnaire and the research upon which each question is based. It avoids using questionnaires that are easy for the profilees to know what answers to give in order to get the job they are applying or to produce profiles that will make them look good.

The profilee can attempt to provide answers that are not representative of them, but if this happens you will almost certainly know.  The consistency score, which measures the consistency of the profilee’s answers, will alert you to possible attempts of doing so.  This score ranges from 0 to 100.  A consistency score of 15 or less could signal an attempt to provide answers that are not representative of them (profilees).  Whilst not infallible, SQI is many times more difficult for profilees to provide answers that are not representative when compared to the lie detection systems of similar types of assessments.

Based on the Optimal Balance research, SQI questions are designed to discover balances and imbalances instead of the ‘stereotyping’ effect that comes from bi-polar scales. The bi-polar tests rested on the assumptions that you have to be either accommodating or competing in your negotiation style. Your experience would have proven this is not true all the time. Our research has shown that the degree to which a person is both accommodating and competing determines real-life effective negotiations. SQI has validated existing research that it is an optimal combination of traits that reveals how effective a presenter, negotiator, leader, etc., a person is.

Most personality tests measure only 10 to 30 traits. They are ‘descriptive in nature’ which are not designed to predict behavior related to job performance. SQI measures more than 100 traits and are cross-referenced in order to identify a person’s strongest emotional and behavioral competencies including information on imbalances that hinder performance of certain jobs / tasks.

 

The Research Underlying the Success Quotient Intelligence System

The system is based on the Choice/Performance Model. The model states that an individual will perform more effectively in a job when they:

 

1.

have a strong interest in the work that matches their personal values / beliefs

2.

see the major part of the required activities are clear and do-able

3.

are in a work environment that matches their personal values / beliefs

 

When these conditions exist, a person will tend to:

 

1.

Choose to perform the activity with the effort to succeed even if he / she doesn’t enjoy the activity

2.

Seek to know how to do it more efficiently

3.

Generally see some or more progress in his / her own effort and do it more often till his / her own objectives are met regardless of criticism received

 

On the other hand, when the probable outcome of an activity and the work environment do not match the values / beliefs of the person, the person will:

 

1.

Choose NOT to perform or delay to perform that activity even if he / she feels partially good about doing part of it as it is only the means which are likely leading to an outcome that does not match the person’s values

2.

Not be motivated to seek help to perform that activity even if resources are readily available

3.

Be motivated to continue justifying the choice not to perform that activity

 

Diagram 1. Choice-Performance Model Diagram by SQI™

 

Over a number of years, we conducted many research projects to examine the traits related to successful performance for a variety of job types.   We removed the traits that were unique to a particular job and used the common traits related to that job type. 

The traits and their complements were selected on the basis of usefulness through a process of trial, error and gradual refinement of traits that are already widely used by other personality assessments.  This process took over numerous years of experimentation prior to computerizing the software.  Traits were selected:

 

1.

To identify the requirements of a wide variety of work situations and task

2.

To identify a wide variety of character strengths and emotional needs at work

3.

In order to identify areas for personal growth that would enhance work potential and facilitate personal leadership and team effectiveness

 

How Success Quotient Intelligence System Work?

Please refer to our SQI website for more information.
Visit the www.sqisystem.com